Public Citizen's blog discovers that all that consumer protection they've asked for has resulted in a proposed Obama-administration regulation to prohibit the use of family income in determining credit-card issuance—with the effect that stay-at-home spouses (mostly women) will be unable to get credit cards in their own name. (Citing Margaret Ryznar @ SSRN.) Earlier.
More unintended consequences from credit-card regulation
- Bidding Bye to the Bank
- Full Federal Pre-emption of State Consumer Protection Food Suits
- New Report - Class Actions, Arbitration, and Consumer Rights: Why Concepcion is a Pro-Consumer Decision
- Zywicki on Skeel on Dodd-Frank
- Harvey Pitt on the future of the SEC
- Nanny-state unintended consequences department?
- Durbin Amendment punishes DC parkers
- Rutledge and Drahozal on CFPB arbitration regulation
- Damned if you do files: Chase Bank credit card class action
- Is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau truly independent?
- New Podcast: John Edwards prosecution
- Plaintiffs' lawyers protect their cartel by bringing antitrust suit
- Frank v. Fitzpatrick: I get to say "told you so!"
- SOPA protests demonstrate the value of limited-government principles
- Adverse effects of CARD Act's limits on freedom of contract