Follow POL on Twitter - More reaction to the King & Spalding sell-out. [ATL; WSJ; Gillers quoted @ NYT; Reynolds; Rubin @ WaPo; Powerline; earlier @ POL]
- Judge in bogus atrazine litigation in Madison County upset at judicial hellhole characterization, but demonstrates it in permitting admission of irrelevant defense-strategy document. [St.L. Post-Dispatch; Alton Telegraph; MC Record; earlier @ POL]
- "What trial lawyers want," heavily citing our own Carter Wood. [Freddoso]
- The Taco Bell PR defense—but don't expect an apology from Beasley Allen for their frivolous class action. [Trask]
- IJ wins eminent domain battle in San Diego. [AP; IJ]
- NLRB claims Boeing's decision to expand South Carolina production violates labor law, but Boeing poorly situated to complain about government diktats. [Carney @ Examiner; Olson link roundup]
Around the web, April 26
Related Entries:
- Treading the Regulatory Waters
- Maryland's Misguided Approach to Growth
- Re-Publication of 2013 Proxy Season Review
- Joe Nocera nails it
- Recess Appointments Update
- New Podcast: Early tracking of shareholder activism in 2013
- What the Gosnell case tells us about medical malpractice efficacy
- New Finding: Union funds pushing companies to separate chairman and CEO roles
- Ezra Klein unfair to Scalia
- Standard Fire v. Knowles
- Accutane recusal motion update
- Richard Epstein: The Supreme Court's Mischievous Environmental Easement
- Today's NLRB Decision Casts a Shadow over the CFPB
- DC Circuit strikes NLRB recess appointments
- More on Higbee recusal motion in Accutane litigation
 |
| Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Communications Manhattan Institute communications@manhattan-institute.org |
