In 2007, a Kentucky trial court judge ruled that Kentucky fen-phen lawyers William Gallion, Shirley Cunningham, and Melbourne Mills Jr. owed $42 million to their clients as a matter of law. An appeals court has held that an expert opinion (by Kenneth Feinberg!) claiming that the three (two of whom have since been convicted of criminal charges) acted "ethically" created an issue of fact requiring trial. The suit will proceed against the three and Stan Chesley, who has confidential disciplinary charges pending against him in Kentucky; "Bar Counsel officials have stated in his disciplinary proceedings that they're seeking Chesley's disbarment." (Jon Newberry, "Court paves way for new fen-phen trial", Cincinnati Business Courier, Feb. 9; Cunningham v. Abbott (Ky. App. 2011).)
Kentucky fen-phen fraud trial decision reversed
Related Entries:
- Paul Larkin on the STOCK Act
- Bad typography evidence of bad faith?
- New podcasts from the Manhattan Institute
- Event video featuring Kenneth R. Feinberg: Is America's legal system broken?
- Defensive customer service
- House Judiciary Subcommittee holds hearing on enforcing foreign judgments
- What media bias? Prakash on Penn State
- "The Public-Union Albatross"
- An employee's revenge
- Kentucky fen-phen scandal update
- Around the web, October 31
- Chesley experts in two cases drop testimony
- Around the web, October 14
- Congressional hearing on asbestos fraud
- Judge orders lawyers to mandatory Labor-Day weekend seminar
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



