Notable judicial figures who admit in speeches that they don't read the fine print in the last year: Chief Justice Roberts (ABA Journal; LA Times), Judge Posner (Blackman), Judge Easterbrook (Blackman, @tedfrank). It should pretty much be a standard interview question for judges and legislators at this point, no?
The fine print
Related Entries:
- Silverman v. Motorola
- Sears v. Butler GVR'ed
- Sears v Butler
- O'Neill on Roberts and NFIB v. Sebelius
- Federal Circuit rejects Apple injunction on Samsung
- Around the web, July 27
- The "Contains Peanuts" warning on a peanut jar
- Roberts can be criticized, but he's no Souter
- Important Seventh Circuit ruling against shareholder derivative strike suits
- Easterbrook on the supposedly politicized Supreme Court
- Robert F. Booth Trust v. Crowley oral argument
- NYC lawsuit payouts: $560M in 2011
- CFPB paternalism
- Around the web, May 10
- A slippery slope?
![]() |
Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
Communications Manhattan Institute communications@manhattan-institute.org |