In the WSJ ($), Paul Rubin draws upon his experience attempting deregulation in the Reagan administration to give another good reason why we should be skeptical of Obama's promise to deregulate. WLF, channeling a different WSJ editorial, looks a bit closer why the combination of the language of executive order and the Obama administration's existing record on regulation gives grounds for skepticism. Earlier.
More on Obama's version of deregulation
Related Entries:
- Lilly Ledbetter Act, job creation, and inequality
- Sackett v. EPA
- A small victory against the EPA
- EPA carbon dioxide rules in DC Circuit
- Reuters fact check
- Obama State of the Union speech
- Hans Bader uncovers a Catch-22 in EEOC enforcement
- Cordray Confirmation Stalemate Continues to 'Handicap' CFPB
- "NLRB Postpones Worker-Notification Rule"
- California SB 469
- Obama's American Jobs Act to create lawyer jobs
- NLRB notice rule
- Around the web, August 31
- Around the web, August 15
- What media bias? Debt-ceiling edition
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



