Remember that appalling $500 million verdict in Nevada against pharmaceutical companies Teva and Baxter Healthcare over reused needles at the notorious Desert Shadow Endoscopy Center causing hepatitis? The more we learn about the verdict, the more appalling it is. George Knapp reports that Judge Jesse Walsh made unbelievably prejudicial rulings, including not allowing the defendants to present evidence that Desert Shadow managers ordered employees to disregard labeling and reuse needles. Even plaintiffs' lawyer Justinian Lane, who's never met a lawsuit against drug companies he didn't like, sees injustice. There are strange procedural shenanigans going on; a second judge made more reasonable evidentiary rulings in a parallel case, and the plaintiffs' lawyers succeeded in getting that case stayed.
"The defense counsel will get absolutely railroaded by Judge Walsh, and when I say railroaded, I mean prison raped."
- What the Gosnell case tells us about medical malpractice efficacy
- Standard Fire v. Knowles
- Suing doctors and drug companies for addiction to pain medication?
- Accutane recusal motion update
- More on Higbee recusal motion in Accutane litigation
- The Philadelphia Story
- HRT punitive damages before Pennsylvania Supreme Court
- ILR survey of state litigation environments
- Cert grant in The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles
- Expert standards in Nevada
- $48 million jackpot justice asbestos award for 86-year-old
- More on 2006 Louisiana environmental law's jackpot justice
- PR efforts in atrazine litigation
- "Missouri lawyers weigh in on class action concerns"
- Around the web, December 15
Center for Legal Policy at the