That's the question C. Boyden Gray and John Shu ask in the new issue of Engage, complaining about its vagueness and delegations of unfettered administrative authority. The Federalist Society has a lot of links related to the article.
Is Dodd-Frank constitutional?
Related Entries:
- Dodd-Frank: A Success Story?
- Dodd-Frank at Four
- Conflict Minerals Conflict Continues
- Richard Epstein: The Improbable Fate of the Durbin Amendment
- CFTC's Aimless Budgeting
- Dodd-Frank's Central Risk-Takers
- Is Volcker the New FCPA?
- CFTC's Latest Invitation to Court
- 100 Days at the SEC
- Banking on Wind
- New Column by Walter Olson: SEC Unveils Expensive Rule on CEO Pay Ratio
- SEC Steps Further Away from Its Mission
- Speaking at 2013 ABA Class Action National Institute
- Unaccountable CFPB Avoids Court Scrutiny
- Court Demands Durbin Rewrite
![]() |
Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
Communications Manhattan Institute communications@manhattan-institute.org |