As a connoisseur of hot-coffee cases, I'm always excited to see a court get one right. The Abnormal Use blog points us to Colbert v. Sonic Restaurants, No. 09-1423, 2010 WL 3769131 (W.D. La. Sept. 21, 2010). The plaintiff made the usual gamut of "design defect" and "failure to warn" claims, but the court wasn't buying it. Note that the plaintiff claimed to be injured by the coffee at Sonic Restaurants, yet another refutation of the trial-lawyer claim that Stella Liebeck's McDonald's coffee was unusually hot.
Gerald Colbert v. Sonic Restaurants hot coffee case
- Zippers, penis injuries, and McDonald's hot coffee redux
- Zippers and McDonald's hot coffee
- A McDonald's hot coffee status report
- "Hot Coffee" Truth
- First Circuit: juries can second-guess FDA "safe and effective" finding
- A slippery slope?
- Stella Liebeck anniversary
- Hot coffee can cause burns at home, too
- CJD still lying about hot coffee
- Questions for Susan Saladoff about "Hot Coffee"
- Lago Agrio lawyers lobbying state AGs?
- First Circuit upholds $1.5M table-saw verdict
- Jamie Leigh Jones lawsuit falling apart
- Debunking Susan Saladoff's "Hot Coffee"
Center for Legal Policy at the