- Iqbal/Twombly update: the Congressional threat to pleading standards. [Corporate Counsel]
- An example of those oh-so-valuable required disclosures about climate change risks. [Bainbridge]
- California courts continue to eat away at risk/benefit test. [Cal Biz Lit]
- Marlo Lewis isn't sanguine about the DOJ brief in Connecticut v. AEP Power. [Pajamas; earlier]
- The threat of OSHA expansion. [Olson @ Cato; McClellan]
- Petition for writ of mandamus in Comer makes a strong case.
- Another challenge to Louisiana med-mal caps. [Louisiana Record]
- More dishonesty in the Jane Mayer New Yorker hit-piece on the Kochs. [Bernstein @ Volokh]
- Why the 2012 election is critical: Senator Leahy expects three or four Supreme Court appointments next term. [Vermont Press Bureau/Times-Argus]
Around the web, September 1
Related Entries:
- Reuters fact check
- Romney and self-deporting
- Felon voting, Santorum, and Romney
- Compucredit v. Greenwood
- Wherein George Soros wastes his money
- The myth of the pro-business Supreme Court (continued)
- Where Newt's wrong--and where he's right
- A shocking concession by Svorny on medical malpractice caps
- The expense of the death penalty
- Marie Gryphon cited for work on loser pays
- Alex Tabarrok on medical patents
- Reuters releases innovative SCOTUS tracking tool
- Supreme Court TV?
- New Featured Discussion: MI and Cato scholars debate med-mal
- Fifth and Ninth Circuits crack down on cy pres abuse
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



