The Kentucky fen-phen scandal appears to stretch to the Beasley Allen firm in Alabama, which horse-traded for several dozen plaintiffs who thought they were being represented by Kentucky attorneys William Gallion, Shirley A. Cunningham, or Melbourne Mills. The Alabama litigation settled for $47k per plaintiff with "minimal injuries," but the plaintiffs only received $29k. They sued over the other $18k, but we'll never find out what happened to it, because the defendants succeeded in having the claims barred by the statute of limitations. [Abel v. Austin]
Abel v. Austin (Ky. App. 2010)
Related Entries:
- Defensive customer service
- Kentucky fen-phen scandal update
- Around the web, June 16
- Kentucky disbars Stan Chesley
- Berry v. Schmidt
- "The Market for Specious Claims"
- Recommended disbarment for Stan Chesley in Kentucky fen-phen scandal
- Ken Feinberg and the Kentucky fen-phen suit
- Kentucky fen-phen fraud trial decision reversed
- Around the web, January 11
- "He said he had worked too long and too hard for a lousy $41 million"
- Beasley Allen's hidden support for Alabama Supreme Court candidate
- Around the web, August 27
- Cincinnati Enquirer on Stan Chesley
- Kentucky Bar investigating Stan Chesley over fen-phen scandal
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



