Follow POL on Twitter - Kagan responds to the Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire. [SCOTUSreport, supplements]
- I still don't think a 20-year-old's senior thesis tells us very much, but one can perhaps take solace from the fact that Kagan criticized the Warren's court's lawlessness. Or not. The scorekeeping of Kagan's Marshall memos in the WSJ piece is really grasping at straws: the Court rejects certiorari in the vast majority of cases, and that Kagan recommended a rejection of cert in several members of that set hardly tells us anything. [WSJ]
- York and Whelan weigh in on the discussion of how Republicans should handle the Kagan nomination. Tit for tat, or make a second effort at truce?
The Kagan nomination, May 19
Related Entries:
- Dahlia Lithwick does it again
- Around the web, April 14
- Ransom v. FIA Card Services
- Cert grant in Ashcroft v. Al-Kidd
- Around the web, August 5
- Around the web, August 2
- The Obama administration, Gill v. OPM, and the politicization of the Department of Justice
- Kagan and "settled law"
- Copland on Kagan
- The Kagan nomination, June 27
- Kagan on tort reform
- The Kagan nomination, June 12
- The Kagan nomination, May 27
- The Kagan nomination, May 18
 |
| Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Communications Manhattan Institute communications@manhattan-institute.org |
