Follow POL on Twitter "[W]hatever I may have written in the books and in the articles would have no bearing on my role as a judge." Really? None at all? Isn't it strange to think the contents of one's writings would have no bearing on one's true convictions, or alternatively that one's true convictions would have no bearing on one's role as a judge? [Whelan]
Goodwin Liu on judges' writings
Related Entries:
- NY Times partisan hackery department: filibuster division
- Reuters fact check
- Rejection of D.C. Circuit nominee may shift judicial nomination practices
- ABA opposes substantial number of Obama Administration's potential judicial nominees
- Texas Supreme Court finishes off Garza v. Merck
- Around the web, July 29
- Senate Blocks Goodwin Liu Nomination to 9th Circuit
- Goodwin Liu, How Harsh to Criticize this 'Brilliant Young Man'
- WSJ on John "Jack" McConnell (D.R.I.) nomination
- Around the web, April 14
- Senate Judiciary approves Jack McConnell for federal bench
- Whelan on Goodwin Liu
- Judiciary hearings next week: Goodwin Liu, Regulations
- "New York Takes Step on Money in Judicial Elections"
- Around the web, February 10
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |
