At Prawfsblawg, PoL contributor Rick Esenberg has a few words for those who think the debate on the constitutionality of the individual mandate is settled even before it arrives at the Supreme Court. Ilya Shapiro has issued a challenge to debate the subject. And the issue has spun off a separate debate, between Rick Hills and Ilya Somin, about whether American libertarians are fonder of federalism than it would make sense for them to be, which also provokes comment from both Esenberg and Shapiro.
Constitutionality of Obamacare, cont'd
Related Entries:
- Greg Conko discusses the FDA's ban on off-label promotion
- SCOTUS Grants 5.5-Hour Oral Argument on Constitutionality of PPACA: What to Expect
- D.C. Circuit Upholds "Minimum Essential Coverage Provision"
- Around the web, August 2
- Epstein on patent reform
- What media bias?
- Information on health-care lawsuits
- McCarthyism or Stupid Politician Trick?
- Employer mandates hidden in health care bill
- State statutes purporting to opt out from Obamacare
- Propositions that may be sold to constituents dep't
- Quoted in Investors Business Daily
- Trial lawyers prepare ad campaign on med-mal
- Connecticut Dept. of Speech Supervision
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



