In Smith v. Baptiste the court upheld an offer of judgment rule (codified at O.C.G.A. 9-11-68) that allows a defendant in a tort case to 'shift' its attorneys fees to the plaintiff if the plaintiff refuses to accept an offer of settlement and ultimately fails to recover more than the amount offered. (Prior post on Georgia offer of judgment rule). The offer of judgment rule was adopted as part of Georgia's comprehensive tort reform legislation in 2005.
In Gliemmo v. Cousineau the court upheld the Georgia statute's limitation of liability for emergency room doctors which limits liability only to claims resulting from "gross negligence."
Groups affiliated with trial lawyers had attacked both elements of the tort reform statute on constitutional grounds. I hope to supplement this post with a longer analysis of the offer of judgment rule case shortly.