Yale law professor Robert Solomon, director of clinical studies at the institution, is plaintiff's counsel in a lawsuit filed late last year contending that it is a violation of Connecticut consumer protection law for McDonald's, Burger King and Friendly's not to disclose to customers that their grilled chicken contains naturally occurring carcinogens (as do a wide variety of grilled, charred and barbecued food). Richard Goldfarb at Food Liability Law has tracked down the documents in Delio v. McDonald's (PDF). One nonobvious point that might be added, however: the "Cancer Project" promoting the lawsuit appears to be yet another project of the dubiously named Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, an animal-rights organization which regularly pursues highly publicized crusades against milk, hot dogs, and many other nonvegetarian articles of diet. If memory serves, though, they usually aren't able to draw on such fancy legal representation. For much more on PCRM, see the coverage at Overlawyered here, here, here, and here.
Yale, PCRM, and grilled chicken
Related Entries:
- Ramseyer on product liability in Japan
- "New Study: U.S. Legal System Is World's Most Costly"
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court Allows Waivers for Future Negligence by Third Parties
- Zippers, penis injuries, and McDonald's hot coffee redux
- Deep pockets files: California concrete thrower
- Zippers and McDonald's hot coffee
- Breaking News: Request to remove judge in Accutane litigation
- $1M baseball bat verdict overturned in Oklahoma
- CPSC attempting to ban "Buckyballs"
- WSJ on Blitz USA
- Blitz USA closes Oklahoma factory
- California rejects tertiary asbestos liability in O'Neill v. Crane
- First Circuit upholds $1.5M table-saw verdict
- Liability for thee, but not for me
- Texas Supreme Court finishes off Garza v. Merck
![]() |
Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
Communications Manhattan Institute communications@manhattan-institute.org |