Follow POL on Twitter And Talking Points Memo is still misleadingly promoting it as a "rape amendment". [Jottings of an Employer's Lawyer]
Franken anti-arbitration measure stays in defense bill
Related Entries:
- The Unconscionability of California's "Amendable" Arbitration Agreements
- Two podcasts
- Public Citizen's Unfair Attack on Arbitration
- von Spakovsky defends arbitration
- American Express v. Italian Colors: Reversal (5-3)
- New Featured Discussion - Class Actions and Arbitration: American Express v. Italian Colors
- American Express v. Italian Colors
- New Report - Class Actions, Arbitration, and Consumer Rights: Why Concepcion is a Pro-Consumer Decision
- Some evidence Concepcion was pro-consumer
- Cert grant in American Express v. Italian Colors
- Rutledge and Drahozal on CFPB arbitration regulation
- Sherry on Dukes and Concepcion
- Plaintiffs' lawyers protect their cartel by bringing antitrust suit
- The Carlyle IPO
- Frank v. Fitzpatrick: I get to say "told you so!"
 |
| Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Katherine Lazarski Manhattan Institute klazarski@manhattan-institute.org |
