Follow POL on Twitter The court unanimously disbarred Bradley Marshall following accusations "of deceiving his clients and forcing them to pay additional fees" after agreeing to take work on a flat fee basis, as well as strong-arming reluctant clients into settlement. [Post-Intelligencer] For Marshall's record of browbeating a local blog over a critical post, see The Stranger/SLOG, HorsesAss and more. Best detail: Marshall "has taught ethics and business law at Seattle Pacific University". [Seattle Times]
"State Supreme Court upholds disbarment of Seattle lawyer"
Related Entries:
- Sixth Circuit brief in Pampers Dry Max class action
- That $285 million Delaware award by Strine
- Marie Gryphon cited for work on loser pays
- Responding to Professor Fitzpatrick on class action fees
- Federal district court dismisses Netflix suit
- Debating attorneys' fees in class actions
- November 23 roundup
- Wal-Mart Settlement Offer: Potentially Pocket Change for Class Member Participants
- Kentucky AG Sued Over Contingency-Fee Arrangement With Private Outside Counsel
- Second Circuit Interprets Prison Litigation Reform Act to Cap Attorney's Fee Award at $1.40
- Barber Auto Sales v. UPS
- Kentucky fen-phen scandal update
- CCAF Ninth Circuit brief: In re HP Inkjet Printer Litigation
- CCAF in the Wall Street Journal
- Coverage of Trial Lawyers Inc.
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |
