Democrats in Congress are preparing a bill to overturn the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling requiring age discrimination plaintiffs to prove that age was the decisive factor in a negative job decision [Boston Globe, New York Times "Room for Debate"] EEOC retaliation claims are on the rise, notes the WSJ [Workplace Prof]. The Senate has adopted an amendment by Sen. Franken (Minnesota) to ban federal defense contractors from using arbitration clauses to resolve a wide variety of discrimination and other claims [Houston Chronicle, Schwartz] And President Obama's nomination of veteran Georgetown lawprof (and ADA drafter) Chai Feldblum will add a strongly liberal voice to the EEOC [Workplace Prof]
Employment law roundup
Related Entries:
- Frank v. Fitzpatrick: I get to say "told you so!"
- EEOC: discrimination against criminals is illegal
- Compucredit v. Greenwood
- Hans Bader uncovers a Catch-22 in EEOC enforcement
- Senate hearing on arbitration and cell-phone contracts
- Around the web, September 27
- Around the web, August 31
- Self-parody NY Times op-ed department: "Ugly? You May Have A Case"
- Bloomberg win on EEOC work/life balance suit
- Hymowitz on the gender gap
- Around the web, August 16
- Damned if you do files: Briscoe v. New Haven
- Around the web, August 15
- Arbitration and adhesion
- Arbitration jiu-jitsu against AT&T Mobility?
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



