Follow POL on Twitter Kevin LaCroix on "Why It Could Pass and Why It Matters". (More: Ribstein). He's also got some comments on the horrible Specter bill to overturn the Iqbal/Twombly line of decisions strengthening the pleadings stage of litigation, on which more from Tony Mauro at the NLJ.
Specter's bill to overturn Stoneridge
Related Entries:
- Johnson & Johnson lawsuit thrown out
- "Twombly is the Logical Extension of the Mathews v. Eldridge Test to Discovery"
- "The Costs of Heightened Pleading"
- In defense of Iqbal and Twombly
- Trial Lawyers, Inc.: K Street -- Federal Government Relations (II)
- Trial Lawyers, Inc.: K Street -- Foundations
- "A Twombly of Scholarship"
- Back to the bad old days on pleading?
- Iqbal and pleading, cont'd
- Iqbal: High court reins in liberal pleading
- Twombly and antitrust
- Twombly pleading under attack
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |
