"With far less fanfare than it generated when it was launched, California's battle to hold six car companies liable for contributing to global warming has come to an end. In a ruling on Wednesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted the state's June 19 motion for voluntary dismissal, ending California's three-year fight to extract hundreds of millions of dollars from the auto industry." [David Bario, AmLaw; Amanda Bronstad, NLJ] Our earlier coverage of the Bill Lockyer/Jerry Brown nuisance-law folly is here, here, here, and here.
Out with a whimper: California AG vs. automakers on global warming
- Michael Mann sues conservative critics for libel
- Schwartz et al. on climate-change litigation
- EPA carbon dioxide rules in DC Circuit
- Around the web, September 30
- Around the web, July 29
- Oral argument in AEP v. Connecticut global warming public nuisance case
- Cert grant in American Electric Power v. Connecticut
- California AG race over, one-party rule commences
- Litigation v. Regulation roundtable
- How entrepreneurial!
- They say lawyers are bad at math, but this is ridiculous
- " Litigating over the environment makes big bucks for trial lawyers"
- Around the web, August 30
- Obama DOJ opposes carbon regulation-through-litigation
- Trial Lawyers, Inc. Update: Environment