Follow POL on Twitter In an interesting review of the lead paint public nuisance cases, the veteran analyst says pressing the courts into service as surrogate regulators didn't work well there.
Alan Ehrenhalt on regulation through litigation
Related Entries:
- Mississippi Supreme Court gets hellhole cleanup opportunity
- Around the web, February 17
- State-hired contingent fee counsel: Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Santa Clara
- More on the John McConnell (D.R.I.) nomination
- Senate moves slowly ...
- California Supreme Court decides Santa Clara v. Superior Court
- Committee vote set for Jack McConnell; Ron Motley honored
- In Rhode Island, campaigning on failure
- NPR lists Kagan's credentials; other nomination controversies
- "Suing the Tobacco and Lead Pigment Industry: Government Litigation as Public Health Prescription"
- Mississippi football player's lead paint win
- Unanimous Wisconsin high court: lead pigment not defectively designed
- Wisconsin lead paint decision
- $7 million Mississippi verdict against Sherwin-Williams
- Rhode Island: Motley Rice's McConnell tagged for federal bench
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |
