PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS PODCASTS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Around the web, February 23 | Full vote for D.C. in Congress? »

February 23, 2009


A "Staggeringly Broad" Statute of 28 Words

"Honest services" fraud, writes Justice Antonin Scalia in a sharp dissent (PDF) to a denial of certiorari today, lacks any "coherent limiting principle" to prevent its "abuse by headline-grabbing prosecutors in pursuit of local officials, state legislators, and corporate CEOs who engage in any manner of unappealing or ethically questionable conduct." The 28-word mail-fraud statute's fundamental vagueness, he concludes, may itself be illegal, making the Court's refusal to squarely confront its meaning and constitutionality "quite irresponsible."

Update: Commentary on Scalia's Sorich dissent from Orin Kerr and my Heritage colleague Brian Walsh.

Posted by Andrew Grossman at 11:52 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Criminal Law and Prosecution









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.