In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation.
This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy.
Martin Redish, "Wholesale Justice", forthcoming in May
- New Video: Manhattan Institute Event on Class Action Lawsuits
- On the Supreme Court cert docket: Glazer and Butler
- Checking the facts on the FACT Act
- American Express v. Italian Colors: Reversal (5-3)
- Richard Epstein and Ted Frank on Comcast v. Behrend
- Comcast v. Behrend
- New Video: Congressional hearing on litigation abuses
- New Featured Discussion - Class Actions and Arbitration: American Express v. Italian Colors
- New Report - Class Actions, Arbitration, and Consumer Rights: Why Concepcion is a Pro-Consumer Decision
- You Lied in Your Autobiography: So We're Suing
- Breaking News: Request to remove judge in Accutane litigation
- Banks push back against lawsuits that target fee-warning signs on ATMs
- New Featured Discussion:"Class actions: rife with abuse or an important legal safeguard?"
- Federal district court dismisses Netflix suit
- Hans Bader on challenging class-action abuses