Courts elsewhere have generally been rightly hostile toward litigation claiming that the sale or ownership of guns creates a "public nuisance", even aside from the preemptive effect of the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Now, however, the Supreme Court of Indiana (of all states) has ruled that the city of Gary's nuisance suit should go to trial. Jon Murray at the Indianapolis Star writes that the Brady Center and other anti-gun litigators are heartened, Gary's being the last standing of thirty municipal suits that have otherwise been withdrawn or gone down to defeat.
Indiana: gun nuisance suit can go to trial
Related Entries:
- Around the web, July 27
- Wal-Mart v. Dukes & A.E.P. v. Connecticut
- Oral argument in AEP v. Connecticut global warming public nuisance case
- Around the web, February 13
- State-hired contingent fee counsel: Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Santa Clara
- Cert grant in American Electric Power v. Connecticut
- Around the web, September 1
- Fourth Circuit slaps down N.C. attorney general's suit against TVA
- California Supreme Court decides Santa Clara v. Superior Court
- Committee vote set for Jack McConnell; Ron Motley honored
- Blaming the banks for urban blight, civic rot, other bad things
- Around the web, March 12
- FBI targets gun business in giant FCPA sting
- Amicus briefs in TVA nuisance case
- Second Circuit ruling against utilities: Activist AGs rejoice
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



