Trial consultant R. Robert Samples asks why some states and portions of states become notorious for their hostility to out-of-state business defendants; he's inclined to ascribe more importance to slants in the judiciary and political systems than to the demographics of local jury pools. He also cites as an important factor "absentee business ownership". That makes intuitive sense at some level, and yet does not fit all the instances: Los Angeles County, Calif. and Cook County, Ill. regularly make it onto hellhole lists even though both host many corporate headquarters as well as a large base of locally owned small businesses.
Why do some localities become "litigation hellholes"?
- What the Gosnell case tells us about medical malpractice efficacy
- Standard Fire v. Knowles
- Accutane recusal motion update
- More on Higbee recusal motion in Accutane litigation
- The Philadelphia Story
- HRT punitive damages before Pennsylvania Supreme Court
- ILR survey of state litigation environments
- Cert grant in The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles
- $48 million jackpot justice asbestos award for 86-year-old
- More on 2006 Louisiana environmental law's jackpot justice
- PR efforts in atrazine litigation
- "Missouri lawyers weigh in on class action concerns"
- Around the web, December 15
- "Something intrinsically unusual is occurring in Philadelphia"
- Another lawless jackpot award over propofol in Nevada