Follow POL on Twitter For all the passionate resistance rightly being mounted to the AFL-CIO's proposed labor law power grab, we can at least be grateful for one thing, which is that hardly anyone is arguing that the U.S. Constitution requires federal labor law to assume a pro-unionization stance. Up in Canada, unfortunately, things are different.
Constitutionalizing labor relations law
Related Entries:
- New Webinar: Shareholder activism concerning corporate spending disclosures
- Proxy Monitor: Potential Influence of ISS over Shareholder Votes
- New Proxy Monitor Report: Will alarming trends in shareholder activism continue in 2012?
- "The Public-Union Albatross"
- Ohio union vote
- "NLRB Postpones Worker-Notification Rule"
- What's in the water in Wisconsin?
- Department of Labor seeks to narrow "advice exception" to disclosure laws
- California SB 469
- NLRB notice rule
- Around the web, August 19
- Around the web, July 27
- Around the web, May 23
- New Proxy Monitor Finding on Executive Compensation
- Daily Show takes on unions
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |
