PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS PODCASTS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Election note: Arizona voters defeat construction-suit bill | Overlawyered.com mostly down »

November 19, 2008


"Class Action Exposure for Failing to Claim Benefits in a Class Action Settlement?"

It all sounds so wonderfully meta and self-feeding, doesn't it? A recent study by the Goal Group, a UK-based "class action services specialist", finds it deplorable that Asian institutional investors often refrain from participating in U.S.-based securities class actions, even after settlement when there would seem to be free money for the taking; the group's managing director describes the institutions as having a "clear duty" to pursue the claims, implying perhaps that a valid class action would lie against them if they fail to cash in. Paul Karlsgodt wonders whether in future to expect "nested" class actions.

Posted by Walter Olson at 2:48 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Class Actions
Comparative Law









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.