The logic seems to be that hundreds of billions of federal dollars can fly out the door to prop up financial institutions, often with relatively little oversight, so long as tough limits are imposed on the (sometimes trivial) share of the sum that goes toward executive salaries. Hodak Value wonders whether this really makes much sense.
Bailout priorities
Related Entries:
- Live Stream featuring Kenneth R. Feinberg: Is America's legal system broken?
- "It's Time To Finalize The Robo-Signing Settlement"
- Around the web, October 14
- "Justice's New War Against Lenders"
- Around the web, August 19
- Around the web, August 15
- Taylor on Title VI disparate impact claims
- DOJ "witch hunt" against banks?
- Objection in Trombley v. National City Bank
- Damned if you do, damned if you don't files - Obama DOJ and "redlining"
- Around the web, October 28
- That auto bailout
- "The victims of 'consumer protection'"
- The hidden taxes of the 111th Congress's regulatory spree
- Suing banks over ATM crime
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



