"...with all of its vaunted high-cost internal controls disclosures? And what's the fix going to be this time? Throwing more executives in jail? Slapping together some more complicated rules without any real consideration given to whether they'll work?" Larry Ribstein has some questions not asked in Capitol Hill's show-trial hearings.
"Where was SOx in all this...?"
Related Entries:
- Around the web, September 2
- SEC adopting strict vicarious liability?
- SEC whistleblower rules
- "Whatever Happened to IPOs?"
- Around the web, February 1
- Around the web, October 17
- "Prognosticating Free Enterprise v. PCAOB"
- "Sarbanes-Oxley Is Working Out Really Great For Michael Oxley"
- Sarbanes-Oxley before the Supreme Court
- "CEO Not Charged With Fraud But SEC Pursues Clawback Anyway"
- "The Peculiar Problem of 'Peekaboo'"
- Supreme Court to rule on constitutionality of SarbOx oversight panel
- Schumer's "say on pay"
- CPSIA, collateral and Sarbanes-Oxley
- Jonathan Macey on corporate governance
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



