The suit, rejected by Ontario's highest court last month, was against a relatively unconventional defendant: the government regulatory agency Health Canada, which it was argued should have been more careful in approving and regulating the devices. Because the agency won on sovereign-immunity grounds, it looks as if the courts never got around to evaluating the plaintiff's contention that leaked silicone had caused them catastrophic health damage (CTV via Class Action Blawg).
Canadian breast implant class action fails
- New Featured Discussion:"Class actions: rife with abuse or an important legal safeguard?"
- Federal district court dismisses Netflix suit
- Hans Bader on challenging class-action abuses
- Wal-Mart Settlement Offer: Potentially Pocket Change for Class Member Participants
- Wal-Mart v. Dukes & A.E.P. v. Connecticut
- Back Doctors Ltd. v. Metropolitan Property & Cas. Ins. Co.: CAFA jurisdictional limits
- Kabateck Brown Kellner and a figurehead plaintiff?
- Today is the AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion argument
- Big Apple v. Apple settlement: Ira Stoll responds
- Lawyers Sue Facebook For Letting Kids Like Advertisements
- Around the web, August 4
- Class actions in the news
- Told-you-so dept.: USDOT exonerates Toyota
- William Lerach's redemption tour hits the D.C. Omni Shoreham
- Canada's class action bust
Center for Legal Policy at the