PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS PODCASTS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« In other discovery news | "Debate on tort reform has reached N.J.'s courtrooms" »

September 10, 2008


Update: Gourdine v. Crews

In a closely watched case (see Jun. 30), Maryland's highest court declined to create a new duty of drugmakers toward third parties who might be injured by persons who take their drugs. The case arose after a diabetic driver who had been prescribed an Eli Lilly insulin product suffered an adverse reaction and ran into the vehicle of a prominent Prince George's County, Md. politician, killing him. The case raised several other issues of which one was pre-emption, as Beck and Herrmann explain. (Examiner; decision, PDF courtesy NAM).

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:07 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Products Liability









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.