Law and medicine Prof. David Studdert of Melbourne University has called for an administered compensation scheme as less chancy and inefficient than malpractice lawsuits seeking to pin blame on obstetricians for the condition. "Some [doctors] see cerebral palsy litigation as a sign of how hopelessly out of touch the courts are with sound science.... Cerebral palsy cases stretch negligence law beyond its limits." Studdert's recent lecture was entitled "Bad babies: Law, Medicine and the battle over neurological birth injury" [University press release, Melbourne Age].
Australia: call for cerebral-palsy fund
- No relationship between million-dollar-plus medmal payouts and prior record
- What the Gosnell case tells us about medical malpractice efficacy
- Suing doctors and drug companies for addiction to pain medication?
- Epstein on providing for the poor
- "Supreme Court case involves medical malpractice awards, Medicaid"
- Does medical malpractice liability lead to better quality health care?
- Missouri Supreme Court strikes down noneconomic damage caps in med mal cases
- Medical malpractice reform in New Hampshire
- Post-tort-reform Texas doctor supply
- Making the case for federal tort reform
- Medical malpractice reform passes House
- HR 5
- New podcasts from the Manhattan Institute
- Event video featuring Kenneth R. Feinberg: Is America's legal system broken?
- A separate thought on Farber-White and medical malpractice