Law and medicine Prof. David Studdert of Melbourne University has called for an administered compensation scheme as less chancy and inefficient than malpractice lawsuits seeking to pin blame on obstetricians for the condition. "Some [doctors] see cerebral palsy litigation as a sign of how hopelessly out of touch the courts are with sound science.... Cerebral palsy cases stretch negligence law beyond its limits." Studdert's recent lecture was entitled "Bad babies: Law, Medicine and the battle over neurological birth injury" [University press release, Melbourne Age].
Australia: call for cerebral-palsy fund
Related Entries:
- Live Stream featuring Kenneth R. Feinberg: Is America's legal system broken?
- A separate thought on Farber-White and medical malpractice
- A shocking concession by Svorny on medical malpractice caps
- Spirited med-mal debate complete!
- Marie Gryphon cited for work on loser pays
- New Featured Discussion: MI and Cato scholars debate med-mal
- Arafiles update
- Liability for thee, but not for me
- Texas tort reform could be a 2012 issue
- Illusory medical malpractice reform in New York
- Around the web, June 5
- Somin on federalism and tort reform
- Hearing: Can We Sue Our Way Into Prosperity?
- The constitutionality of HR 5
- The Commerce Clause, sufficient for federal medical tort reform?
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



