All-blog edition:

• Daniel Schwartz ties together the FASB's litigation-accounting proposal with the recent study on litigants' difficulty in predicting outcomes of trial [Conn. Empl't Law Blog]; he's also guestblogging this week at my other site [Overlawyered]


• Mentioning a lawprof's comments without notifying her = "bullying"? Really? [Hoffman @ Concurring Opinions, Bartow comment at Prawfsblawg via Greenfield]


• Judge Lamberth berates Wiley Rein and Wilmer Hale over high fees in False Claims Act case [Legal Times "BLT"]


• More from David Bernstein on expert testimony controversies: Australian "hot-tubbing" of experts, need for criminal forensics reform, ABC on Love Canal [@ Volokh]


• Tacky, tacky WhoCanISue.com marketing [Elefant/Legal Blog Watch]


• One view of Adam Liptak's "American exceptionalism" law series in the NYT [Luiza Ch. Savage, Maclean's]


• Lawprofs discuss value of pet's life in damage-suit context [Miller & Karp, Scheuerman/TortsProf]


• High U.S. infant mortality rates show the disgrace of our health system? Not so fast [Newmark's Door]