Let's say you run a "trust-based" business, where customers' confidence in your surviving in business is crucial to their willingness to buy your service. After a series of reverses, you begin to wonder whether your fund is headed for the status of "toast". Do you rush to the nearest microphone and announce that to the public, thus ensuring in a self-fulfilling prophecy that it will become toast even if you weren't convinced that was a certainty before? Or, like Bear Stearns hedge fund managers Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin, do you instead steel yourself for eventual federal prosecution, complete with camera-ready perp walk?
About those Bear Stearns prosecutions
Related Entries:
- The Carlyle IPO
- MetLife fires 4,300 citing uncertainty and overregulation
- Hans Bader on SEC charges against former Fannie and Freddie execs
- SEC files to appeal Judge Rakoff's rejection of Citi settlement
- Federal district court rejects Citigroup-SEC settlement, sets trial date
- SEC and Citigroup Anxiously Await Ruling
- Cordray Confirmation Stalemate Continues to 'Handicap' CFPB
- Around the web, August 31
- Taylor on Title VI disparate impact claims
- Presenter for trial lawyers: Director of Alabama Securities Commission
- Zywicki on CFPB
- Guest blogger: Professor Michael Perino
- Around the web, April 14
- "Whatever Happened to IPOs?"
- Dodd-Frank crimes
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



