Rep. Shadegg has introduced the Enumerated Powers Act, H.R. 1359, which will require that all bills introduced in the U.S. Congress contain "a concise and definite statement" setting forth the specific constitutional authority "relied upon for enactment." The idea is to encourage Congress to engage in more debates upon the scope of its constitutional authority before passing legislation, though with no Democratic co-sponsors, one imagines it is unlikely Rep. Conyers will let the House Judiciary Committee let it get to the floor. Sen. Coburn will introduce parallel legislation in the Senate.
Enumerated Powers Act
Related Entries:
- Greg Conko discusses the FDA's ban on off-label promotion
- SCOTUS Grants 5.5-Hour Oral Argument on Constitutionality of PPACA: What to Expect
- D.C. Circuit Upholds "Minimum Essential Coverage Provision"
- Around the web, August 2
- Epstein on patent reform
- What media bias?
- Information on health-care lawsuits
- Constitutionality of Obamacare, cont'd
- Sotomayor's Short Opinions: Hiding From The Law
- D.C. Vote, the Constitution, AND the Courts
- Full vote for D.C. in Congress?
- U.S. Constitution "at least as easy to understand as a cell phone contract -- and vastly more important"
- "Fairness" vs. "What's in the Constitution"
- Enumerated Powers Act on Senate-side
- The Logical Conclusion of Judicial Activism
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



