PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS PODCASTS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Check the date | "Organized Labor's International Law Project?" »

April 1, 2008


Paul Offit in NYT

On the recent Poling vaccine-injury case:

The system [the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, financed by a tax on every dose of vaccine] worked fine until a few years ago, when vaccine court judges turned their back on science by dropping preponderance of evidence as a standard. Now, petitioners need merely propose a biologically plausible mechanism by which a vaccine might cause harm -- even if their explanation contradicts published studies.

Posted by Walter Olson at 9:48 PM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Products Liability









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.