PointofLaw.com

spacer FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Ideas for narrowing qui tam | Recent opinion roundup »

April 9, 2008


Greenspan's case

There's a big effort to blame the former Fed chairman for the rise and fall of the housing bubble -- though in fact comparable run-ups in housing prices went on simultaneously in many other advanced countries, with their own monetary policies and systems of housing finance regulation. His response?

The problem is not the lack of regulation but unrealistic expectations about what regulators are able to prevent. How can we otherwise explain how the UK's Financial Services Authority, whose effectiveness is held in such high regard, fumbled Northern Rock? ... Even with full authority to intervene, it is not credible that regulators would have been able to prevent the subprime debacle.

Martin Wolf argues in the FT that central banks "can surely lean against the wind" even if they cannot eliminate bubbles. I know of no instance in which such a policy has been successful.

Whole thing here.

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:31 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Miscellaneous









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.