The challenge to the Vioxx settlement made on ethical grounds (which got substantial publicity in the New York Times and blogosphere when it was filed last week) was voluntarily withdrawn in a brief filed on December 22, and will not be argued on January 7 as originally reported. The supporting papers in the motion to withdraw state that the parties are meeting on the issue and have made "great progress," but do not specify what that progress is.
BREAKING: Challenge to Vioxx settlement withdrawn
Related Entries:
- "A Public Letter From the Cobell Lawyers Prompts Ethics and Harassment Concerns"
- Around the web, January 27
- McClintic v. Lithia Motors
- "Missouri lawyers weigh in on class action concerns"
- CCAF Second Circuit brief in Blessing v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
- Courts still ignoring cy pres requirements
- Responding to Professor Fitzpatrick on class action fees
- Federal district court dismisses Netflix suit
- Hans Bader on challenging class-action abuses
- Wherein CCAF is "justly lauded"
- Debating attorneys' fees in class actions
- November 23 roundup
- Fifth and Ninth Circuits crack down on cy pres abuse
- Wal-Mart Settlement Offer: Potentially Pocket Change for Class Member Participants
- Barber Auto Sales v. UPS
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



