I've got some thoughts at Overlawyered about a Public Citizen report assailing credit card arbitration clauses, the centerpiece of which is a "consumer win rate" number that might, if one were being charitable, be termed extremely misleading.
Public Citizen, "The Arbitration Trap"
Related Entries:
- Compucredit v. Greenwood
- Senate hearing on arbitration and cell-phone contracts
- Around the web, September 27
- Around the web, August 16
- Around the web, August 15
- Arbitration and adhesion
- Around the web, August 11
- Arbitration jiu-jitsu against AT&T Mobility?
- "The Senate's Lawsuit Factory"
- Jamie Leigh Jones lawsuit falling apart
- Around the web, May 23
- Fisher on Concepcion
- Court rules for NVIDIA
- AT&T v. Concepcion: "Consumers Win in Allegedly Anti-Consumer Supreme Court Ruling"
- "Former Silicosis Clients Sue O'Quinn Law Firm, Estate"
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



