Federal Judge Peter Beer yesterday dismissed a Louisiana "whistleblower" lawsuit filed under the federal False Claims Act that alleged massive insurance company fraud on the government in Hurricane Katrina claims adjusting. Beer cited an earlier-filed, similar lawsuit brought by prominent Mississippi trial lawyer Dickie Scruggs on behalf of his clients, the Rigsby sisters, as a jurisdictional bar to the Louisiana case. Both the Louisiana case and the Scruggs-Rigsby lawsuit, Ex rel. Rigsby, have been discussed in recent evidentiary filings by special prosecutors appointed by another federal judge, William Acker, to pursue a charge of criminal contempt against Scruggs. Click here to read my post at Insurance Coverage Law Blog about the two False Claims Act lawsuits and how they factor into the criminal case against Scruggs.
Katrina 'whistleblower' lawsuit dismissed in favor of similar Scruggs lawsuit
- Scruggs appeal denied
- Scruggs tries to wiggle out of guilty plea
- Around the web, August 15
- No surprises on Zach Scruggs
- Documentary "Injustice" on Reelz tonight
- Around the web, February 10
- Around the web, August 2
- Zach Scruggs: "post comments on all Rossmiller's blogs and overtake it with our propaganda"
- On the Scruggs scandals, "Kings of Tort"
- Judge tosses Hood Katrina-insurance suit
- Here are a few of the problems with activist AGs
- The other Scruggs Katrina scandal
- Katrina litigation is still hot
- Fifth Circuit hands State Farm a big win in Hurricane Katrina litigation
- "Facing Mother Nature"