 |
|
|
FORUM « "Due Process for Exxon" | Illinois trial lawyers » October 23, 2007Cause in Fact and Vioxx, part N This Newark Star Ledger [thanks to ILR] report on a case to be argued before the New Jersey Supremes today is a significant one. You might have caused me damage (though you probably didn't cause me any). Must you pay for testing to check to see if you caused me damage? No, says traditional common law "preponderance of the evidence" doctrine. Posted by Michael Krauss at 1:49 PM | TrackBack (0) |
|
|
Published by the Manhattan Institute
| ||
