PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Doug Baird vs. Lynn LoPucki | "Health Courts, Administrative Compensation and Patient Safety" »

October 10, 2007


Around the web, October 10

  • Generic charges of statistical disparities, unconscious bias and too-wide managerial discretion fuel current wave of employment-bias class actions -- and rare is the big employer not vulnerable on one or more of those fronts [Parloff, Fortune]
  • Kentucky officials sue maker of Oxycontin seeking recoupment of money spent on drug abuse programs, policing [AP]
  • One perspective on the tainted-hamburger scare [Szwarc]
  • Underplayed angle in Stoneridge hubbub: law firms themselves are a prime target for suits alleging aiding and abetting [NLJ]
  • Three members of San Antonio family are indicted on charges of submitting fraudulent fen-phen charges [USDoJ]
  • Washington state's unique sovereign un-immunity rules keep generating big suits over crimes committed by ex-cons [Seattle Times (Algona hit/run, $1.8 million settlement), KOMO (murder in Tacoma, family seeks $45 million)]
  • More attention for Ohio AG Marc Dann, scourge of subprime lending and much else [WSJ law blog, Columbus Dispatch via Chamber]

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:09 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Employment Law









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.