Follow POL on Twitter I was going to complain about the tens of millions attorneys will take for the parasitical settlement in a California class action, but Josh Wright has beaten me to it with a post analyzing the underlying Conwood billion-dollar mugging; he's also done much more extensive work on the subject.
$96m Smokeless Tobacco Cases class action settlement
Related Entries:
- New Featured Discussion:"Class actions: rife with abuse or an important legal safeguard?"
- Around the web, January 27
- Federal district court dismisses Netflix suit
- Hans Bader on challenging class-action abuses
- Wal-Mart Settlement Offer: Potentially Pocket Change for Class Member Participants
- Breaking: SCOTUS denies cert in Philip Morris USA v. Jackson
- Wal-Mart v. Dukes & A.E.P. v. Connecticut
- No jackpot justice in Escambia County tobacco suit
- Back Doctors Ltd. v. Metropolitan Property & Cas. Ins. Co.: CAFA jurisdictional limits
- SCOTUS denies cert in Compact Clause challenge to tobacco MSA
- Kabateck Brown Kellner and a figurehead plaintiff?
- Around the web, December 29
- Around the web, November 18
- CEI cert petition challenging tobacco settlement
- Today is the AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion argument
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Katherine Lazarski Press Officer, Manhattan Institute klazarski@manhattan-institute.org |
