PointofLaw.com

spacer FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Irvine-Chemerinsky train wreck | The history of organized philanthropy, in 46 words? »

September 13, 2007


State AGs versus Boston Scientific/Guidant

Dr. Wes is distinctly unimpressed with the settlement negotiated by 35 state attorneys general with the maker of implantable defibrillators, which he says tries to take credit for a problem-reporting system although one already exists. As for the $16.75 million payout, less than a million will go to affected patients, while the bulk appears destined to flow into the great circular fund that is the AGs' own litigation budgets. "Given how little is returned to the patients affected, our legal system should be embarrassed instead of gloating about their achievements in press releases. But at least our patients can expect higher prices for future defibrillator models to offset these predatory suits."

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:15 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Regulation Through Litigation









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.