Michael Greve has an intriguing long-term perspective on the last two years of Roberts Court decisions in business cases that complements my earlier Liability Outlook on OT 2006. The two of us will be joined by Latham & Watkins's Maureen Mahoney (a former Deputy Solicitor General) and Mayer Brown's Andrew Pincus (formerly of the Clinton administration) to discuss the previous and forthcoming Supreme Court terms on Friday, September 28 as part of the annual AEI Legal Center for the Public Interest Supreme Court Briefing. Registration and breakfast is free and CLE credit in your state may be offered: contact Sara Wexler at AEI for more information.
"Does the Court Mean Business?"
Related Entries:
- New Podcasts: The constitutionality of Obamacare
- Obamacare Debate Complete: The participant with the most compelling argument was...
- Sackett v. EPA
- Coming next week: featured discussion on PPACA
- A small victory against the EPA
- New Podcasts: Making sense of the court order in Kiobel
- Kiobel debate complete
- New Featured Discussion: Kiobel and corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute
- Supreme Court hears argument on Stolen Valor Act
- Compucredit v. Greenwood
- Wherein George Soros wastes his money
- The myth of the pro-business Supreme Court (continued)
- The expense of the death penalty
- Alex Tabarrok on medical patents
- Reuters releases innovative SCOTUS tracking tool
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



