PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Blawg Review #68 | $1 million bid for Spitzer access »

August 2, 2006


Breaking: Defense verdict in Grossberg v. Merck, first California Vioxx case

The jury deliberations took just four and a half hours. "The 12-person jury deliberated for four and a half hours before finding that Merck wasn't negligent. The jury didn't award Mr. Grossberg any damages. The jury voted that Vioxx did have risks that were knowable, but that the risks didn't present a substantial danger to users." Early WSJ coverage. More Point of Law coverage of Vioxx litigation.

Posted by Ted Frank at 7:11 PM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Vioxx/Drug Litigation









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.