PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« What explains insider trading laws? | Some Investment Advice from the Trial Bar »

June 14, 2006


Ohio med-mal proposals

The Ohio Senate has passed and the House is now being asked to consider S.B. 88, which "would establish a Northeast Ohio pilot program in which all medical malpractice claims would go through a mandatory arbitration process before going to trial." The arbitration panels would consist of dispute resolution professionals and persons conversant in the relevant medical specialty. Interesting tidbit:

Ohio had a voluntary arbitration process in place two decades ago. However, that system did not contain a so-called "loser pays" provision included in the current legislation. Backers of the new measure say the provision means the losing party in arbitration, if it also loses at a subsequent trial, must pay its opponent's legal costs — a strong deterrent to the filing of frivolous lawsuits.

Under the failed arbitration system from the 1970s and '80s, plaintiff attorneys would take a "dive" and lose arbitration on purpose just to get to trial, said Mike Wise, a McDonald Hopkins Co. LPA attorney and lobbyist for the Academy of Medicine.

(Crain's Cleveland Business; via Kevin Pho).

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:16 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Loser Pays
Medicine and Law
Procedure









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.