PointofLaw.com

FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS PODCASTS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

FORUM

« Barratry in Pennsylvania | "A Farce or a Tragedy?" »

June 15, 2005


Loser-Pays and Election Litigation

A court in Helena, Montana has refused to apply the state's loser-pays rule to shift attorneys' fees in a case that challenged the eligibility of ballots cast in an election for the statute legislature.

The Helena Independent Record opined that loser-pays rules shouldn't apply in litigation involving elections because there is a public interest at stake in the outcome in addition to the personal stakes of the candidates. It wrote, "[W]e realize that "loser-pays" laws are designed to deter frivolous lawsuits. But we have to agree with Judge Christopher, who said that "candidates and their attorneys should not have to subsidize the rest of the state by bearing the entire burden" of the cost."

Posted by Jonathan B. Wilson at 7:26 AM | TrackBack (0)



categories:
Loser Pays









 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.