Follow POL on Twitter For readers who enjoyed our recent featured discussion about competition in the market for personal-injury representation, Prof. Brickman presents his views in article form in the Summer issue of the Cato Institute's journal Regulation (where I once served as an editor, long ago). There's also a response written by Michael Abramowicz.
"Making Lawyers Compete"
Related Entries:
- That $285 million Delaware award by Strine
- Marie Gryphon cited for work on loser pays
- Responding to Professor Fitzpatrick on class action fees
- Federal district court dismisses Netflix suit
- Debating attorneys' fees in class actions
- November 23 roundup
- Wal-Mart Settlement Offer: Potentially Pocket Change for Class Member Participants
- Kentucky AG Sued Over Contingency-Fee Arrangement With Private Outside Counsel
- Second Circuit Interprets Prison Litigation Reform Act to Cap Attorney's Fee Award at $1.40
- Barber Auto Sales v. UPS
- Kentucky fen-phen scandal update
- CCAF Ninth Circuit brief: In re HP Inkjet Printer Litigation
- CCAF in the Wall Street Journal
- Coverage of Trial Lawyers Inc.
- Jim Hood's coupon settlement
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |
