The Project on Medical Liability in Pennsylvania, which is funded by the Pew Foundation and whose orientation can perhaps best be described as establishmentarian, has released a new report on dissatisfaction among physicians in that crisis-ridden state. Not surprisingly, it finds high levels of anxiety in the most besieged specialties. The survey sampled 1,333 specialists in high-risk fields and drew 824 responses: "148 emergency medicine physicians, 155 general surgeons, 52 neurosurgeons, 187 obstetrician/gynecologists, 127 orthopedic surgeons, and 155 radiologists". "Eighty-six percent of specialists had been named in a malpractice suit at least once during their careers, and 47 percent had been sued in the three years prior to the survey." The "high rate of suit among physicians in our sample suggests that these physicians� fear of lawsuits may be well-founded." (Michelle M. Mello, David M. Studdert, Catherine M. DesRoches, Jordon Peugh, Kinga Zapert, Troyen A. Brennan, and William M. Sage, "Caring For Patients In A Malpractice Crisis: Physician Satisfaction And Quality Of Care", Health Affairs, Jul./Aug. (PDF)).
Dissatisfied (and much-sued) docs in Pa.
- The Emperor's Clothes: Should jury bias against corporations receive legal recognition?
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court delivers significant asbestos ruling
- The medical liability language in the health care law
- Michigan: "State's top court is siding with malpractice claims"
- From Linda Gorman, Independence Institute: more on those IOM medical-error numbers
- Save our hospitals from New York's malpractice climate
- Massachusetts med mal: Prof. Marc Rodwin responds
- Marc A. Rodwin et al., Malpractice Premiums In Massachusetts
- "What determines malpractice payments?"
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court races
- Bob Herbert's "Malpractice Myths"
- The New York Times on medical malpractice
- Med-mal: news from Libya and Somalia
- "N.C. Senate approves medical malpractice bill"
Center for Legal Policy at the